 |
| Packaged S&A Microdevice,
manufactured at ARRI using the M³ via automated,
heterogeneous microassembly. |
 |
 |
|
Objective:
To develop a systematic methodology for designing automated machines
that enable assembly and packaging of small-scale systems.
These multiscale robots operate across scales from macro
to nano, and their design is guided by a set of hierarchical
precision principles. They target low-volume pilot production
of sensors, actuators, and other heterogeneous microdevices
by using reconfigurable and modular hardware and software.
Approach:
- We use a multiscale, top-down approach
to bridge the scale gap based on:
-
Part size: Macro
(cm) – Meso
(mm) - Micro – (µm) – Nano (nm)
-
Robot size: Macro (m) – Meso (cm) – Micro
(mm) – Nano
(µm)
-
Robot accuracy: Meso (mm) – Micro
(µm) – Nano (nm)
- We use a variety of technologies
for micro sensing and actuation:
-
Si, PZT, and Metal MEMS, such as SOI DRIE, MUMPS.
-
Other non-silicon microsystems: glass, SMA, plastics,
LIGA.
- M³ is
a multiscale robotic tool for small-scale device manufacturing
with a workspace of several cubic feet, and is used
to assemble and package devices with cm to mm part
sizes and mm tolerances. M³ is currently
used for the automated production of S&A microdevices
at the Bennington Microtechnology Center in Vermont.
- µ³ is
a multiscale robotic tool for small-scale device manufacturing,
with a several cubic centimeter workspace and is used
to assemble devices with mm to µm part sizes
and nm tolerances. µ³ is used
in the assembly of wafer-level microrobots, S&A
MEMS, and optical bench on a chip devices such as microspectrometers,
optical attenuators, etc.
- Dimensional and throughput gaps between the micro
and nano scales are covered by the N³ wafer scale
microfactory containing arrays of microrobots assembled
by µ³ and packaged by M³.
Accomplishments:
- Prototyping of modular systems for
the assembly and packaging of MEMS:
-
Off-the-shelf and
custom hardware combined to obtain a multiscale precision
assembly system.
-
Macro and micromanipulation robotic
platforms used in conjunction with machine vision,
a supervisory control system, process tools such as
a diode laser, and a variety of fixtures and end-effectors
customized for each assembly task.
-
Robot end-effectors
mounted using tool-changer adapters used to perform
pick, place, and alignment operations of micro and
meso scale parts.
- Hardware & software
architecture handles both bonding processes and manipulation
of microcomponents allowing for:
-
Modularity and reconfigurability.
-
A number of standard process capabilities,
in particular fluxless die and fiber attach.
-
Yield-aware
prototyping of non-electronic IC devices such as MEMS,
MOEMS and microfluidics.
-
Task-oriented control
and vibration suppression to attain fine positioning.
-
Multiple
manipulators share a common workspace.
- System software implemented in
Labview™ ,
is responsible for:
-
Manipulator calibration,
inverse kinematics.
- Vibration-free trajectory planning.
-
Assembly
and packaging sequence execution.
-
Exception handling
and yield monitoring.
-
Visual
servoing and microscope assisted calibration.
- Collision avoidance.
- Systematically
use fixtures, calibration, inverse kinematics and visual
servoing to achieve the necessary levels of precision
across multiple scales. Use of assembly primitives
and workspace mapping to required accuracy levels so
that the assembly sequence can be planned entirely
in software.
Applications:
- Automated assembly for fiber-optics,
MOEMS and MEMS components.
- Devices such
as micro-optical benches, WDM components, NxN fiber
arrays.
- Assembly and packaging of discrete
microfluidics.
Publications:
[1] |
D.O. Popa, H. E. Stephanou, “Micro and Meso Scale Robotic Assembly”, in SME Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 6 No. 1, 2004, 52-71. |
[2] |
D. O. Popa, R. Murthy, J, Sin, M. Mittal, H.E. Stephanou, “M3-Modular Multi-Scale Assembly System for MEMS Packaging”, in proc. Of IEEE/RSJ Int’l Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS ’06), Beijing, China, October 2006. |
[3] |
D.O. Popa, R. Murthy, J. Sin, M. Mittal, H.E. Stephanou, “M3: Modular Microassembly System for MEMS Packaging,” in proc. Of IMAPS International Conference, San Diego, October 2006. |
[4] |
D.O. Popa, J. Sin, R. Murthy, M. Mittal, and H. Stephanou., "Modular Microassembly System for MEMS Packaging", in proc. of ANS Conference Sharing Solutions for Emergencies and Hazardous Environments, Salt Lake City, Utah, February 2006. |
[5] |
D. O. Popa, B. J. Kang, J. Sin, and J. Zou, “Reconfigurable Micro-Assembly System for Photonics Applications”, IEEE International Conference for Robotics and Automation, Washington, D.C., June, 2002. |
[6] |
A. C. Sanderson and W. H. Lee, “Self-Reconfiguration of Modular Tetrobot Truss Structures,” IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation Workshop of Self-Reconfigurable Robots, May, 2001. |
[7] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Dynamics and Distributed Control of Modular Robotic Systems,” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Ind. Elec., Control and Inst., Nagoya, Japan, October, 2000. |
[8] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Dynamic Rolling, Locomotion Planning, and Control of an Icosahedral Modular Robot,” IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Takamatsu, Japan, October, 2000. |
[9] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Dynamic Rolling of Modular Robots,” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation, April, pp. 2840-2846, 2000. |
[10] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Distributed Computation of Dynamics in Reconfigurable Robotics,” IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct., pp. 1561-1566, 1999. |
[11] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Distributed Control and Computation in a Parallel Modular Robotic System,” SPIE, Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems II, vol. 3839-23, pp. 192-201, September, Boston, 1999. |
[12] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Dynamics and Distributed Control of Tetrobot Modular Robots,” IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Auto., pp. 2704-2710, May, 1999. |
[13] |
W. H. Lee and A. C. Sanderson, “Dynamic Simulation of Tetrahedron-Based Tetrobot,” IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intel. Robots and Systems, pp. 630-635, Oct., 1998. |
Related Topics
:
Robotic Assembly :
Microrobotics
Multiscale
& Modular Robotics
Active Surfaces
|